https://github.com/adrian-prantl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70528
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
@@ -461,13 +461,11 @@ static void ParseOSVersion(llvm::VersionTuple &version,
NSString *Key) {
// Invoke xcrun with the shlib dir.
if (FileSpec fspec = HostInfo::GetShlibDir()) {
if (FileSystem::Instance().Exists(fspec)) {
-std::string contents_dir =
-
@@ -461,13 +461,11 @@ static void ParseOSVersion(llvm::VersionTuple &version,
NSString *Key) {
// Invoke xcrun with the shlib dir.
if (FileSpec fspec = HostInfo::GetShlibDir()) {
if (FileSystem::Instance().Exists(fspec)) {
-std::string contents_dir =
-
@@ -461,13 +461,11 @@ static void ParseOSVersion(llvm::VersionTuple &version,
NSString *Key) {
// Invoke xcrun with the shlib dir.
if (FileSpec fspec = HostInfo::GetShlibDir()) {
if (FileSystem::Instance().Exists(fspec)) {
-std::string contents_dir =
-
@@ -461,13 +461,11 @@ static void ParseOSVersion(llvm::VersionTuple &version,
NSString *Key) {
// Invoke xcrun with the shlib dir.
if (FileSpec fspec = HostInfo::GetShlibDir()) {
if (FileSystem::Instance().Exists(fspec)) {
-std::string contents_dir =
-
https://github.com/bulbazord approved this pull request.
Makes sense to me
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70528
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/bulbazord edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70528
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Adrian Prantl (adrian-prantl)
Changes
The code was incorrectly going into the wrong direction by removing one
component instead of appendeing /Developer to it. Due to fallback mechanisms in
xcrun this never seemed to have caused any issues
https://github.com/adrian-prantl created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70528
The code was incorrectly going into the wrong direction by removing one
component instead of appendeing /Developer to it. Due to fallback mechanisms in
xcrun this never seemed to have caused any issues.
>
