https://github.com/mbucko closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95997
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/mbucko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95997
>From 3ba6a550cb4731b9754646665e18fcdc6e255bd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miro Bucko
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:35:55 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Fix SBAddressRange validation checks.
---
lldb/include/lldb/
https://github.com/clayborg approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95997
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/JDevlieghere approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95997
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
https://github.com/mbucko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95997
>From ca4dcf373b0617ab588ee804e3d28f8d311da06a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miro Bucko
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:35:55 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Fix SBAddressRange validation checks.
---
lldb/include/lldb/
clayborg wrote:
> This class behaves quite differently from other SB API classes. Normally, the
> opaque pointer can be cleared to release the potentially more resource heavy
> private counterpart. `AddressRange` is a pretty simple class, so I understand
> that it makes things easier if we gua
https://github.com/mbucko updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95997
>From 59c382f0b06d632c05baeb357c0390a2423932fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miro Bucko
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:35:55 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Fix SBAddressRange validation checks.
---
lldb/source/API/SB
mbucko wrote:
> This class behaves quite differently from other SB API classes. Normally, the
> opaque pointer can be cleared to release the potentially more resource heavy
> private counterpart. `AddressRange` is a pretty simple class, so I understand
> that it makes things easier if we guara
https://github.com/JDevlieghere requested changes to this pull request.
This class behaves quite differently from other SB API classes. Normally, the
opaque pointer can be cleared to release the potentially more resource heavy
private counterpart. `AddressRange` is a pretty simple class, so I u
https://github.com/clayborg approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95997
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Miro Bucko (mbucko)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95997.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) lldb/source/API/SBAddressRange.cpp (+3-15)
- (modified) lldb/test/API/python_api/address_range/TestAddressRa
https://github.com/mbucko created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95997
None
>From 786e94dae236eafb71c2f001f48ed17651abd3e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miro Bucko
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:35:55 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb] Fix SBAddressRange validation checks.
---
lldb/source/
12 matches
Mail list logo
