[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D85107: Add a test for 'b' (toggle breakpoint)

2020-08-05 Thread Luboš Luňák via Phabricator via lldb-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rGdb828aba55ac: [lldb][gui] add a test for 'b' (toggle breakpoint) (authored by llunak). Herald added a project: LLDB. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D85107: Add a test for 'b' (toggle breakpoint)

2020-08-04 Thread Greg Clayton via Phabricator via lldb-commits
clayborg accepted this revision. clayborg added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Sounds like it is ok for tests to be here, looks good. Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D85107/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D85107

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D85107: Add a test for 'b' (toggle breakpoint)

2020-08-04 Thread Greg Clayton via Phabricator via lldb-commits
clayborg added a comment. lldb/test/API is for testing the public LLDB API functions that are exported as lldb::SB*. Not sure this belongs here. There was another patch that was moving things around as well where I commented with the same issue. Repository: rLLDB LLDB CHANGES SINCE LAST ACT

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D85107: Add a test for 'b' (toggle breakpoint)

2020-08-03 Thread Luboš Luňák via Phabricator via lldb-commits
llunak updated this revision to Diff 282543. llunak edited the summary of this revision. llunak added a comment. Removed use of curses python module, lldbexpect hardcodes TERM=vt100, so the escape sequence should be actually hardcoded too. The previous version didn't work e.g. in Linux console.

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D85107: Add a test for 'b' (toggle breakpoint)

2020-08-02 Thread Luboš Luňák via Phabricator via lldb-commits
llunak created this revision. llunak added a reviewer: clayborg. llunak requested review of this revision. The test needs the python curses module, to get the proper escape sequence to send the down key event. I'm not sure if it's ok to just use the module, or if some check for it should be adde