@lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D33504: Fix FDE indexing while scan
debug_info section
Please note that version in the debug_frame is is specific to the call frame
information.
It is not the same as DWARF version number.
Regards,
Abid
From: lldb
To: Pavel Labath; lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D33504: Fix FDE indexing while scan
debug_info section
.debug_frame may exist, even if there is no other debugging information. In
this case we cannot obtain DWARF version from debug_info and ParseCIE is the
only
Labath [mailto:lab...@google.com]
Sent: Friday, 26 May, 2017 2:17 PM
To: Robinson, Paul
Cc: Tatyana Krasnukha ;
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D33504: Fix FDE indexing while scan
debug_info section
Yes, that would definitely be a good idea. I was just saying that
, 2017 9:17 AM
>> To: Tatyana Krasnukha
>> Cc: lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
>> Subject: Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D33504: Fix FDE indexing while scan
>> debug_info section
>>
>> +lldb-commits
>>
>> Yes, that is certainly a viable approach. If there is a
a lldb-commits
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 9:17 AM
> To: Tatyana Krasnukha
> Cc: lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
> Subject: Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D33504: Fix FDE indexing while scan
> debug_info section
>
> +lldb-commits
>
> Yes, that is certainly a viable approach. If
+lldb-commits
Yes, that is certainly a viable approach. If there is a subset of
dwarf that we are capable of parsing correctly then it would be great
to enable that.
On 25 May 2017 at 16:46, Tatyana Krasnukha
wrote:
> This binary uses DWARF 4, that introduces two additional fields in CIE -
> ad
