On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Jim Ingham wrote:
> We've had a couple of cases of "dead" code which turned out to be the
> llvm.org side of generic behavior for which Swift was the only current
> specific implementation. So while I agree, little single functions that
> aren't used anywhere
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL300729: [Utility/StringLexer] Remove dead code. (authored by
davide).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32148?vs=95519&id=95788#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D321
We've had a couple of cases of "dead" code which turned out to be the llvm.org
side of generic behavior for which Swift was the only current specific
implementation. So while I agree, little single functions that aren't used
anywhere are fine to cull, anything that looks like it might be the fo
davide added a comment.
Thanks!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32148
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
zturner accepted this revision.
zturner added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
No need to request review when removing dead code.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32148
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
ht
davide created this revision.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32148
Files:
include/lldb/Utility/StringLexer.h
source/Utility/StringLexer.cpp
Index: source/Utility/StringLexer.cpp
===
--- source/Utility/StringLexer.cpp
+++ source/Util
