This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL296335: Merge Linux and FreeBSD arm register contexts
(authored by labath).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27126?vs=79287&id=89866#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.or
krytarowski added a comment.
This diff looks good and appreciated for other posix-like systems.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27126
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
labath added a comment.
Just found this lying on the bottom of my stack. Ed, if you don't object, I'd
like to check in it. I think it is quite a safe change, so we probably don't
need to do too much testing.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27126
___
lld
emaste added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D27126#609150, @labath wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D27126#607057, @dmikulin wrote:
>
> > I can run tests on 32bit ARM FreeBSD 11.RC3 rpi2, but without software
> > single step not a lot of tests pass on ARM FreeBSD ;)
> > Can we get h
labath added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D27126#607057, @dmikulin wrote:
> I can run tests on 32bit ARM FreeBSD 11.RC3 rpi2, but without software single
> step not a lot of tests pass on ARM FreeBSD ;)
> Can we get https://reviews.llvm.org/D25756 committed?
I'll leave that decision
dmikulin added a comment.
I can run tests on 32bit ARM FreeBSD 11.RC3 rpi2, but without software single
step not a lot of tests pass on ARM FreeBSD ;)
Can we get https://reviews.llvm.org/D25756 committed?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27126
___
lldb-co
emaste added a subscriber: dmikulin.
emaste added a comment.
I think @dmikulin might be able to test this
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27126
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-c
labath created this revision.
labath added reviewers: emaste, sas.
labath added a subscriber: lldb-commits.
Herald added subscribers: mgorny, rengolin, aemerson.
These two register contexts were identical, so this shouldn't cause any
regressions, but I'd appreciate it if you can check that this at
