Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D20274: Add preliminary bits for Plugins/Process/NetBSD

2016-05-26 Thread Kamil Rytarowski via lldb-commits
krytarowski abandoned this revision. krytarowski added a comment. It no longer builds due to mutex refactoring. Remove as it will need to be redone for remote debugging. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D20274 ___ lldb-commits mailing

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D20274: Add preliminary bits for Plugins/Process/NetBSD

2016-05-16 Thread Kamil Rytarowski via lldb-commits
krytarowski added a comment. > Does remote debugging interest you? Yes. However, on the other hand it's low priority for me right now. I will rebase to FreeBSD once I will get improved system support in ptrace(2) and functional process/core instrumentation. Repository: rL LLVM http://rev

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D20274: Add preliminary bits for Plugins/Process/NetBSD

2016-05-16 Thread Ed Maste via lldb-commits
emaste added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20274#431058, @clayborg wrote: > What linux and macosx do is even when debugging locally we run through > lldb-server (a GDB remote protocol server). And this is the way we plan to go on FreeBSD as well and will drop the in-process debugging

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D20274: Add preliminary bits for Plugins/Process/NetBSD

2016-05-16 Thread Greg Clayton via lldb-commits
clayborg requested changes to this revision. clayborg added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed. If you want remote debugging, you should actually implement the lldb-server code and not do a native Process plug-in. What linux and macosx do is even when debugging locally we r