tfiala accepted this revision.
tfiala added a comment.
This happened, right? Can we close?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16872
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
tberghammer accepted this revision.
tberghammer added a comment.
Looks reasonable
Comment at: packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py:672-682
@@ -768,1 +671,13 @@
+
+def skipUnlessListedRemote(remote_list=None):
+def is_remote_unlisted(self):
+if remote_list and l
labath accepted this revision.
labath added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I think it's a good idea. I haven't given it a spin, but I think we can fix up
any breakages from this on the fly.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16872
__
zturner added a comment.
Perhaps one possibility to avoid the massive changes to every test file
required by changes like this is to make a module like `test_imports.py`, and
have that file import all of these things, and then have each test just import
`test_imports`. That way we don't have t
zturner created this revision.
zturner added reviewers: labath, tberghammer, tfiala.
zturner added a subscriber: lldb-commits.
Herald added subscribers: srhines, danalbert, tberghammer.
This creates the `decorators.py` module and moves some of the low level common
decorators there.
There are man
