[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D156268: [lldb] Treat ARM64X images as ARM64.

2023-07-26 Thread Jacek Caban via Phabricator via lldb-commits
jacek added a comment. Herald added a subscriber: JDevlieghere. Thanks for review and testing. I created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64131 for the backport. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156268/new/ https://reviews.

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D156268: [lldb] Treat ARM64X images as ARM64.

2023-07-26 Thread Jacek Caban via Phabricator via lldb-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rG48feef277a24: [lldb] Treat ARM64X images as ARM64. (authored by jacek). Herald added a project: LLDB. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156268/ne

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D156268: [lldb] Treat ARM64X images as ARM64.

2023-07-26 Thread antoine moynault via Phabricator via lldb-commits
antmo added a comment. I confirm that the 7 failed tests are now Ok CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D156268/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D156268 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cg

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D156268: [lldb] Treat ARM64X images as ARM64.

2023-07-26 Thread antoine moynault via Phabricator via lldb-commits
antmo added a comment. In D156268#4534366 , @mstorsjo wrote: > I think this looks good. Did @antmo verify that it actually fixes the issue? > (It seems plausible, although there may be more similar cases hiding > somewhere?) Not yet. Struggling a bit w