This revision was landed with ongoing or failed builds.
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rG0a2d4f3f24a3: [lldb] Enable Rust v0 symbol demangling
(authored by Alexander Mols , committed by teemperor).
Repository:
rG LLVM Gith
clayborg added a comment.
Yes, good to go!
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104054/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104054
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lis
asm added a comment.
@teemperor @clayborg Is this good to go? :)
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104054/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104054
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@list
asm added a comment.
And thank you for the quick review!
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104054/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104054
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.o
teemperor accepted this revision.
teemperor added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM, thanks! (And congrats on your first patch)
I'll land this for you next week just to give the others another chance to take
a look.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES
asm updated this revision to Diff 351481.
asm marked an inline comment as done.
asm added a comment.
code style fixes, use modern log
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104054/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104054
Files:
lldb/include/
clayborg added a comment.
Once teemperor's issues are resolved this looks good to me!
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104054/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104054
___
lldb-commits mailing l
teemperor added inline comments.
Comment at: lldb/unittests/Core/MangledTest.cpp:72
+
+ EXPECT_STREQ("", TheDemangled.GetCString());
+}
asm wrote:
> teemperor wrote:
> > Could you do me a favour and change your test functions to LLDB's code
> > style, so `mangl
asm added inline comments.
Comment at: lldb/unittests/Core/MangledTest.cpp:72
+
+ EXPECT_STREQ("", TheDemangled.GetCString());
+}
teemperor wrote:
> Could you do me a favour and change your test functions to LLDB's code style,
> so `mangled_name` as a variable
teemperor added a comment.
This seems reasonable to me, but I'll leave this open for a while in case
someone that knows more about Rust mangling shows up. Otherwise I'll accept
this next week.
Comment at: lldb/source/Core/Mangled.cpp:213
+else
+ LLDB_LOGF(log, "deman
asm created this revision.
asm added reviewers: clayborg, wallace.
Herald added subscribers: pengfei, JDevlieghere.
asm requested review of this revision.
Herald added a project: LLDB.
Herald added a subscriber: lldb-commits.
Rust's v0 name mangling scheme [1] is easy to disambiguate from other
na
11 matches
Mail list logo