sirmc added a comment.
Yes, I wasn't sure what the exact semantics were for step-inst for LLDB. I
think the issue is not mainly the mimicking of GDB behavior, but rather that it
is inconvenient for some use-cases.
To give some context on why I propose this change: the current behavior is
prett
sirmc created this revision.
sirmc added a reviewer: LLDB.
sirmc added a project: LLDB.
Herald added a subscriber: lldb-commits.
sirmc edited the summary of this revision.
When executing `thread step-inst `/ `si` on an instruction that returns to the
same PC, LLDB currently keeps stepping indefin
