ojhunt wrote:
> Perhaps silly initial question: why do we need a whole different qualifier
> for this? Why can you not write `__ptrauth uintptr_t foo`?
Not a silly question, back when first implemented we spent time thinking about
this.
The concern was basically `T* __ptrauth(...)` can repres
https://github.com/ojhunt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137580
>From 0129e28643f667febb23dba1521134a6151c2f7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Hunt
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 22:33:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Add `__ptrauth_restricted_intptr` qualifier
__ptrauth_rest
https://github.com/ojhunt created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137580
__ptrauth_restricted_intptr provides a mechanism to apply pointer
authentication to pointer sized integer types.
>From 7af378bbec4c7cf3896f6f7bc95d816e398930f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Hunt
Date: S
