dylanmckay added a comment.
> However, if we look at this locally, if the AVR architecture has a trap
> opcode (maybe to implement __builtin_debugbreak() -- I am assuming that's
> what 0x98 0x95 is), then I don't see a problem with this function returning
> it.
Chiming in from an AVR perspecti
dylanmckay added a comment.
This looks good to me from an AVR point of view. I don't have very much
experience with LLDB however.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D73969/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D73969
_