cmtice wrote:
I think I have addressed all your concerns. Please take another look; thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145055
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-
https://github.com/cmtice updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145055
>From e9079e6357b933e84603997edb8d0cd27a515989 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Caroline Tice
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:33:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [LLDB] Update DIL to pass current 'frame var' tests.
As a pr
https://github.com/cmtice updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145055
>From e9079e6357b933e84603997edb8d0cd27a515989 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Caroline Tice
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:33:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [LLDB] Update DIL to pass current 'frame var' tests.
As a pr
https://github.com/cmtice updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145055
>From e9079e6357b933e84603997edb8d0cd27a515989 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Caroline Tice
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:33:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [LLDB] Update DIL to pass current 'frame var' tests.
As a pr
https://github.com/da-viper updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143644
>From 24e8bbe12758773ef9ca55c3c4022a610db434e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ebuka Ezike
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 02:14:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb-dap] Prevent using an implicit `step-in`.
When there is a
https://github.com/da-viper updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143644
>From 6ff8149d35aa931c7f08373d92cf556ad0d9abc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ebuka Ezike
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 02:14:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [lldb-dap] Prevent using an implicit `step-in`.
When there is a
da-viper wrote:
> Would it work if we replace the call to `fn1` with some other statement --
> one that doesn't involve function calls. E.g. maybe assignment to a volatile
> variable.
Yeah it is reproducible with a volatile variable before the function call.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pr