emaste added a comment.
With this patch i386 test results are comparable to amd64, and I'm happy with
it from a FreeBSD perspective (modulo the PlatformOpenBSD patch conflict).
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34776
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-comm
emaste added a comment.
The change in PlatformOpenBSD.cpp failed to apply for me (although it was
trivial to manually apply it).
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34776
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin
Author: abhishek
Date: Mon Aug 7 10:15:26 2017
New Revision: 310270
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=310270&view=rev
Log:
Fixed build failure for revision r310261
-- Was failing for Linux
Modified:
lldb/trunk/tools/intel-features/cli-wrapper.cpp
Modified: lldb/trunk/tools/inte
emaste added a comment.
With this patch I observed three new failures on FreeBSD and three new
unexpected passes on FreeBSD. An example of a new failure:
==
FAIL: test_inferior_crashing_expr_step_and_expr_dwarf
(TestInferio
Author: abhishek
Date: Mon Aug 7 08:53:30 2017
New Revision: 310266
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=310266&view=rev
Log:
Fixed build failure for revision r310261
-- Build was failing for freebsd
Modified:
lldb/trunk/tools/intel-features/CMakeLists.txt
Modified: lldb/trunk/too
abhishek.aggarwal added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33035#833876, @clayborg wrote:
> I was out on vacation, sorry for the delay. Looks good.
Thanks a lot Greg for your feedback. I am merging the patch now.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33035
clayborg accepted this revision.
clayborg added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I was out on vacation, sorry for the delay. Looks good.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33035
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm
clayborg added a comment.
I was out on a week long vacation, sorry for the delay. The main questions is:
should symbols with NOTYPE actually be included in any address lookups. I would
vote for no as how can 1 address resolve to more than one section. That doesn't
make sense to me. One address
clayborg accepted this revision.
clayborg added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
I was out on vacation, sorry for the delay. Looks good.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36068
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm
clayborg accepted this revision.
clayborg added a comment.
Remove the outdated comment and we are good to go.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33213
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ll
emaste added a comment.
The patch LGTM, I will test it soon.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35223
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
emaste added a comment.
Sorry I missed this when first uploaded, I will look at it shortly.
For future uploads can you kindly include full context, as described in
https://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html?
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35223
emaste added a comment.
Sorry I missed this when first uploaded, I will look at it shortly.
For future uploads can you kindly include full context, as described in
https://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34776
___
lldb-co
abhishek.aggarwal added a comment.
Hi Greg .. Can you please review the changes? Please let me know if something
needs to be changed. Thanks :)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33035
___
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.l
14 matches
Mail list logo