[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D26124: [LLDB-MI] Escape MI output in a more consistent manner

2016-10-29 Thread Vadim Macagon via lldb-commits
enlight created this revision. enlight added reviewers: ki.stfu, abidh. enlight added a subscriber: LLDB. enlight set the repository for this revision to rL LLVM. While attempting to run lldb-mi on Windows it became apparent that it doesn't consistently escape output, for instance error messages

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D26093: Limit LLDB_EXPORT_ALL_SYMBOLS to additionally export only the lldb_private namespace symbols

2016-10-29 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-commits
tfiala added a comment. Here's what you get with the same codebase, but using this cmake line instead: cmake -GNinja ../llvm -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -DLLDB_EXPORT_ALL_SYMBOLS:BOOL=YES bin/lldb (lldb) log enable -S lldb process (lldb) target create /bin/ls Current executable set to

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D26093: Limit LLDB_EXPORT_ALL_SYMBOLS to additionally export only the lldb_private namespace symbols

2016-10-29 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-commits
tfiala added a comment. >> Could you elaborate on this? > > Sure, I'll see if I can reproduce the lack of backtrace symbol lookup that I > was experiencing without exporting those symbols back in roughly Oct/Nov > 2015. We've been using this flag ever since to address it. > >> I've been debug

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D26093: Limit LLDB_EXPORT_ALL_SYMBOLS to additionally export only the lldb_private namespace symbols

2016-10-29 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-commits
tfiala added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26093#582825, @labath wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26093#582618, @tfiala wrote: > > > > If it unblocks something it might be ok, but it doesn't actually fix the > > > problem. > > > > It allows debugging of lldb with lldb on Ubuntu.

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D26093: Limit LLDB_EXPORT_ALL_SYMBOLS to additionally export only the lldb_private namespace symbols

2016-10-29 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-commits
labath added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D26093#582618, @tfiala wrote: > > If it unblocks something it might be ok, but it doesn't actually fix the > > problem. > > It allows debugging of lldb with lldb on Ubuntu. This broke recently, and > the CL here re-enables the ability to do t