Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D20436: Clean up vestigial remnants of locking primitives

2016-07-26 Thread Saleem Abdulrasool via lldb-commits
compnerd added a subscriber: sas. compnerd added a comment. @emaste I think so. I was hoping that @zturner or @sas would be able to get a windows run. However, Linux and FreeBSD should give us some assurance that this is good. How about I go ahead and commit this tomorrow? https://reviews.l

[Lldb-commits] Buildbot numbers for the last week of 7/17/2016 - 7/23/2016

2016-07-26 Thread Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits
Hello everyone, Below are some buildbot numbers for the last week of 7/17/2016 - 7/23/2016. Please see the same data in attached csv files: The longest time each builder was red during the last week; "Status change ratio" by active builder (percent of builds that changed the builder status from

[Lldb-commits] Buildbot numbers for the week of 7/10/2016 - 7/16/2016

2016-07-26 Thread Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits
Hello everyone, Below are some buildbot numbers for the week of 7/10/2016 - 7/16/2016. Please see the same data in attached csv files: The longest time each builder was red during the week; "Status change ratio" by active builder (percent of builds that changed the builder status from greed to r

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D22771: Fix LLDBConfig.cmake to enable python enabled build for all 64 bit lldb targets

2016-07-26 Thread Muhammad Omair Javaid via lldb-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL276814: Fix LLDBConfig.cmake to enable python enabled build for all 64 bit lldb targets (authored by omjavaid). Changed prior to commit: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22771?vs=65397&id=65612#toc Repository

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D22771: Fix LLDBConfig.cmake to enable python enabled build for all 64 bit lldb targets

2016-07-26 Thread Muhammad Omair Javaid via lldb-commits
omjavaid added a comment. I am going ahead and committing this patch. If it breaks any build please revert it. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D22771 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cg

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r276814 - Fix LLDBConfig.cmake to enable python enabled build for all 64 bit lldb targets

2016-07-26 Thread Omair Javaid via lldb-commits
Author: omjavaid Date: Tue Jul 26 16:43:02 2016 New Revision: 276814 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=276814&view=rev Log: Fix LLDBConfig.cmake to enable python enabled build for all 64 bit lldb targets Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22771 Modified: lldb/trunk/

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r276796 - The ARM single-step handling needs to look for breakpoint on the next instruction.

2016-07-26 Thread Jim Ingham via lldb-commits
Author: jingham Date: Tue Jul 26 14:50:25 2016 New Revision: 276796 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=276796&view=rev Log: The ARM single-step handling needs to look for breakpoint on the next instruction. Modified: lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/Process/Utility/StopInfoMachException

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r276795 - Check both private & public states to decide if you need to halt before killing.

2016-07-26 Thread Jim Ingham via lldb-commits
Author: jingham Date: Tue Jul 26 14:47:45 2016 New Revision: 276795 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=276795&view=rev Log: Check both private & public states to decide if you need to halt before killing. We were just checking the public state, but that meant if you were hung in a long

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r276760 - reduce Green Dragon macOS build session filename length

2016-07-26 Thread Todd Fiala via lldb-commits
Author: tfiala Date: Tue Jul 26 11:08:26 2016 New Revision: 276760 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=276760&view=rev Log: reduce Green Dragon macOS build session filename length The Green Dragon builder for macOS started failing yesterday with session filenames that were too long. Thi

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D22132: Support for OCaml native debugging

2016-07-26 Thread Elias Boutaleb via lldb-commits
ebtaleb added a comment. What's left for commiting this revision? I did setup git-svn accordingly, but I don't have a commit bit. https://reviews.llvm.org/D22132 ___ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D22756: Fix incorrect form test in SymbolFileDWARF

2016-07-26 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL276735: Fix incorrect form test in SymbolFileDWARF (authored by labath). Changed prior to commit: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22756?vs=65340&id=65479#toc Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r276735 - Fix incorrect form test in SymbolFileDWARF

2016-07-26 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-commits
Author: labath Date: Tue Jul 26 03:16:19 2016 New Revision: 276735 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=276735&view=rev Log: Fix incorrect form test in SymbolFileDWARF Summary: We were checking whether an attribute is in block form by getting the block data pointer, which was not correct

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D22755: Fix DataExtractor::PeekData for zero length peeks

2016-07-26 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL276734: Fix DataExtractor::PeekData for zero length peeks (authored by labath). Changed prior to commit: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22755?vs=65339&id=65478#toc Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llv

[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r276734 - Fix DataExtractor::PeekData for zero length peeks

2016-07-26 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-commits
Author: labath Date: Tue Jul 26 03:11:57 2016 New Revision: 276734 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=276734&view=rev Log: Fix DataExtractor::PeekData for zero length peeks Summary: The function was returning the null pointer for peeks of size zero, which seems like a sensible thing to

Re: [Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D22771: Fix LLDBConfig.cmake to enable python enabled build for all 64 bit lldb targets

2016-07-26 Thread Pavel Labath via lldb-commits
labath added a comment. It seems this was added in 2014 for cross-compilation for android. Given that it's in a `if ! PYTHON` block and we don't use python anymore on android, I think it's pretty safe to remove. Thanks. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D22771 ___