Re: [Live-devel] regression in live555 connecting an acti camera

2010-06-22 Thread Ross Finlayson
I just found another camera not working anymore. The error message is still about invalid range header, but this time npt is well written. It seems live555 doesn't accept "now-" : OK, this is definitely a bug in our code, because "npt=now-" is legal, according to the RTSP specification. Thi

Re: [Live-devel] regression in live555 connecting an acti camera

2010-06-22 Thread Sébastien Escudier
Quoting Ross Finlayson : > This is wrong. It should be "npt", not "ntp". I just found another camera not working anymore. The error message is still about invalid range header, but this time npt is well written. It seems live555 doesn't accept "now-" : Received 119 new bytes of response data. R

Re: [Live-devel] regression in live555 connecting an acti camera

2010-06-18 Thread Ross Finlayson
> You should contact the camera's manufacturer, asking them to fix their camera's RTSP server. Thank you for investigating it, I'll contact them. With luck, they'll have a firmware upgrade already available... > By the way, you were incorrect when you said that a previous version of o

Re: [Live-devel] regression in live555 connecting an acti camera

2010-06-18 Thread Sébastien Escudier
Quoting Ross Finlayson : > You should contact the camera's manufacturer, asking them to fix > their camera's RTSP server. Thank you for investigating it, I'll contact them. > By the way, you were incorrect when you said that a previous version > of our code (2009.07.27, according to your "workin

Re: [Live-devel] regression in live555 connecting an acti camera

2010-06-18 Thread Ross Finlayson
I can't connect anymore to an acti camera using latest version of live555. I don't know since which version exactly it doesn't work. 1- output of new version not working : http://www.celeos.eu/tmp/notworking.txt 2- output of an old working version : http://www.celeos.eu/tmp/working.txt OK, I

Re: [Live-devel] regression in live555 connecting an acti camera

2010-06-18 Thread Ross Finlayson
May be it is because in "notworking" case request is resent with the same CSeq? Yes, that was the problem with the "Sony" camera. Also I noticed that that sendPauseCommand for SubSession sends "PLAY". Is it copy/paste error? Yes, but that has already been fixed in the latest version of the

Re: [Live-devel] regression in live555 connecting an acti camera

2010-06-18 Thread Yuri Timenkov
ve-devel-boun...@ns.live555.com [mailto:live-devel- > boun...@ns.live555.com] On Behalf Of Sйbastien Escudier > Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 12:26 PM > To: LIVE555 Streaming Media - development & use > Subject: Re: [Live-devel] regression in live555 connecting an acti > camera > >

Re: [Live-devel] regression in live555 connecting an acti camera

2010-06-18 Thread Ross Finlayson
I found another camera not working anymore with live555. It's a sanyo. The issue seems different. Yes, it was easy to figure out the problem with the Sanyo camera; it was (quite rightfully) complaining because we didn't change the "CSeq" number when we retransmitted the DESCRIBE request follow

Re: [Live-devel] regression in live555 connecting an acti camera

2010-06-18 Thread Sébastien Escudier
Quoting Sébastien Escudier : > I can't connect anymore to an acti camera using latest version of live555. I found another camera not working anymore with live555. It's a sanyo. The issue seems different. log of latest version not working : http://www.celeos.eu/tmp/sanyo_notworking.txt log of an