Re: [Live-devel] Status of Live555 RTPS Client and Server using Stream over TCP

2009-01-05 Thread Matt Schuckmann
Ross Finlayson wrote: After doing a bit more digging in the code and on the web I've discovered that the problem of not receiving RTSP commands after the play command when using RTP-over-TCP streaming is a known problem (although it is usually associated with the keep-a-live feature (cough h

Re: [Live-devel] Status of Live555 RTPS Client and Server using Stream over TCP

2008-12-31 Thread Ross Finlayson
After doing a bit more digging in the code and on the web I've discovered that the problem of not receiving RTSP commands after the play command when using RTP-over-TCP streaming is a known problem (although it is usually associated with the keep-a-live feature (cough hack The standard way fo

Re: [Live-devel] Status of Live555 RTPS Client and Server using Stream over TCP

2008-12-31 Thread Matt Schuckmann
I found this very good discussion on persistent tcp vs non-persistent tcp RTSP clients. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg00655.html From reading some of this thread and the live555 RTPSClient code it appears that the RTSPClient is a persistent tcp client is this true? H

Re: [Live-devel] Status of Live555 RTPS Client and Server using Stream over TCP

2008-12-31 Thread Matt Schuckmann
After doing a bit more digging in the code and on the web I've discovered that the problem of not receiving RTSP commands after the play command when using RTP-over-TCP streaming is a known problem (although it is usually associated with the keep-a-live feature (cough hack) and not with usages

Re: [Live-devel] Status of Live555 RTPS Client and Server using Stream over TCP

2008-12-31 Thread Matt Schuckmann
Ok I've got a little more information. With respect to problem #2 I've discovered that the server is not receiving or responding to any RTSP commands once the play command has been issued when streaming over tcp. In particular I've tested the TEARDOWN and SET_PARAMETER commands both of which th