Thanks of answers.
From: live-devel-boun...@ns.live555.com
[mailto:live-devel-boun...@ns.live555.com] On Behalf Of Ross Finlayson
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 3:05 AM
To: LIVE555 Streaming Media - development & use
Subject: Re: [Live-devel] Parsing frames received by testRTSPClient
S
> Since, I just want to receive stream and send to decoder, do you think using
> testRTSPClient over OpenRTSP would be an advantage or there should be no
> difference if either one is used from CPU cycles perspective? I’m about to
> profile both on my system.
Both applications use about the sam
?
Regards,
Yogesh.
From: live-devel-boun...@ns.live555.com
[mailto:live-devel-boun...@ns.live555.com] On Behalf Of Ross Finlayson
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 3:22 AM
To: LIVE555 Streaming Media - development & use
Subject: Re: [Live-devel] Parsing frames received by testRTSPClient
I wa
> I want two know if testRTSPClient allows me to specify codec type and if it
> can give me single encoded frame every time afterGettingFrame() is invoked?
Yes. Look at the "DummySink" class that the "testRTSPClient" demo application
uses. Note, in particular, the (non-static) "DummySink::afte