Cristiano Belloni wrote:
Matt Schuckmann wrote:
We use MJPEG over RTP to send on demand hi resolution still images
along side our video which is lower res H.264.
Is there an extension to the MJPEG standard that allows JPEG over 2k
x 2k? If so we'd be interested in implementing it.
Matt S.
M
Matt Schuckmann wrote:
We use MJPEG over RTP to send on demand hi resolution still images
along side our video which is lower res H.264.
Is there an extension to the MJPEG standard that allows JPEG over 2k x
2k? If so we'd be interested in implementing it.
Matt S.
Matt, don't top-post please
We use MJPEG over RTP to send on demand hi resolution still images along
side our video which is lower res H.264.
Is there an extension to the MJPEG standard that allows JPEG over 2k x
2k? If so we'd be interested in implementing it.
Matt S.
Cristiano Belloni wrote:
Ross Finlayson wrote:
Som
Ross Finlayson wrote:
Someday we will support RTP header extensions (though not necessarily
this particular application of them (see above)).
More generally, though, I'm curious about why people are still
interested in JPEG-over-RTP, especially with very large JPEG images.
JPEG is a *terrible
1) Do you plan to support ONVIF RTP/RTSP enhancements in live555
liveMedia libraries in the close future?
I'll support this only if it ends up being adopted by the IETF (the
organization that standardizes RTP payload formats and header
extensions). In particular, "ONVIF" will need to persuade
