Re: [Live-devel] Multicast Interface Addr (solution)

2007-05-31 Thread Ross Finlayson
Sorry, but I can't make this change. The existing code is the whole reason why we allow "ReceivingInterfaceAddr" to be something other than INADDR_ANY. -- Ross Finlayson Live Networks, Inc. http://www.live555.com/ ___ live-devel mailing list live-dev

Re: [Live-devel] Multicast Interface Addr (solution)

2007-05-31 Thread xcsmith
Forgive my extra post, but maybe it would be easier to understand if you change the line to this: MAKE_SOCKADDR_IN(name, INADDR_ANY, port.num()); Xochitl___ live-devel mailing list live-devel@lists.live555.com http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [Live-devel] Multicast Interface Addr (solution)

2007-05-31 Thread xcsmith
Thanks for your response, but I don't think this fixes the problem. Why bother setting the Sending- and ReceivingInterfaceAddr at all if you are going to get the address using multicast loopback first? When I try this in my system with multicast enabled on eth1 and eth0, the multicast loopback