On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:18:59AM -0600, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> Yes, and for this reason (especially given the ambiguity in the RTSP
> specification), I have now installed a new version (2010.09.22) that
> will accept both kinds of "port=" parameter.
Great, thanks for the fast resolution!
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 01:51:09 -0600, Ross Finlayson wrote
No, this is a bug in the RTSP server (webcam); not a bug in our code.
The problem is the parameter field
port=5000
This is nonstandard. The RTSP specification (RFC 2326, section
12.39) clearly states that the "port=" parameter
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 01:51:09 -0600, Ross Finlayson wrote
> No, this is a bug in the RTSP server (webcam); not a bug in our code.
> The problem is the parameter field
> port=5000
> This is nonstandard. The RTSP specification (RFC 2326, section
> 12.39) clearly states that the "port=" parame
No, this is a bug in the RTSP server (webcam); not a bug in our code.
The problem is the parameter field
port=5000
This is nonstandard. The RTSP specification (RFC 2326, section
12.39) clearly states that the "port=" parameter (for multicast
streams) should be specified as a range - e.
