Re: [Live-devel] use of unitialized memory in our_MD5End

2012-01-24 Thread PROMONET Michel
Media - development & use Objet : Re: [Live-devel] use of unitialized memory in our_MD5End In any case, this isn't a concern, because we're using MD5 here to generate a 'pseudo-random' value. It doesn't matter if some of the memory that MD5 reads happens to be &#

Re: [Live-devel] use of unitialized memory in our_MD5End

2012-01-23 Thread Ross Finlayson
In any case, this isn't a concern, because we're using MD5 here to generate a 'pseudo-random' value. It doesn't matter if some of the memory that MD5 reads happens to be 'uninitialized'. Ross Finlayson Live Networks, Inc. http://www.live555.com/ ___

Re: [Live-devel] use of unitialized memory in our_MD5End

2012-01-23 Thread PROMONET Michel
to maintain Best Regards, Michel. [@@THALES GROUP RESTRICTED@@] De : live-devel-boun...@ns.live555.com [mailto:live-devel-boun...@ns.live555.com] De la part de Ross Finlayson Envoyé : vendredi 20 janvier 2012 15:18 À : LIVE555 Streaming Media - development & use Objet : Re: [Live-d

Re: [Live-devel] use of unitialized memory in our_MD5End

2012-01-20 Thread Ross Finlayson
> What do you think ? I think that "valgrind" is incorrect in this case. In the implementation of "Authenticator::setRealmAndRandomNonce()", both fields of the "seedData" structure are initialized. (The "timestamp" field is initialized via the call to "gettimeofday()"; the "counter" field is

[Live-devel] use of unitialized memory in our_MD5End

2012-01-20 Thread PROMONET Michel
Hi, Valgrind report use of memory that is not initialized in our_MD5End. Use of uninitialised value of size 8 (see: http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/mc-manual.html#mc-manual.uninitvals) at 0xE5558F: our_MD5End (our_md5hl.c:34) by 0xE55751: our_MD5Data (our_md5hl.c:67)