Re: [Live-devel] parseGeneralConfigStr

2010-01-08 Thread Ross Finlayson
2. I have a second question about live555 stability in long run tests. We plan to use live555 (the client side) to receive and record streams from cameras with built-in RTSP servers. I am not aware of any other RTSP/RTP implementation that we could use, I think there are not many of them out th

Re: [Live-devel] parseGeneralConfigStr

2010-01-07 Thread Ross Finlayson
Hi Ross, 1. Thanks for your reply. Just for anybody who wants to receive the correct mpeg4 configuration header, the solution is simple. One must replace No, it's even easier: Replace your current version of the code with the latest version (2010.01.07), which fixes the bug. -- Ross Finlayso

Re: [Live-devel] parseGeneralConfigStr

2010-01-07 Thread Němec Alexandr
whatever on the client side? Thanks for any comment. Best regards Alex >- >Od: Ross Finlayson >Přijato: 7.1.2010 7:49:55 >Předmět: Re: [Live-devel] parseGeneralConfigStr > >>why does the parseGeneralConfigStr function

Re: [Live-devel] parseGeneralConfigStr

2010-01-06 Thread Ross Finlayson
why does the parseGeneralConfigStr function (used for parsing the MPEG4 configuration header) return one more byte than I would expect? Thanks - you've identified a bug in the code. That extra byte should not be there (this code was mistakenly copied from "parseStreamMuxConfigStr()", which *d

[Live-devel] parseGeneralConfigStr

2010-01-06 Thread Němec Alexandr
Dear all, why does the parseGeneralConfigStr function (used for parsing the MPEG4 configuration header) return one more byte than I would expect? Having a configuration string C the resulting byte array should have strlen(C)/2 bytes. Of course, if strlen(C) is odd (which should normally not be t