> I need to stream a mkv in a loop, i know that I need to write my own
> ByteStreamFileSource subclass
No, I don't recommend doing things this way.
Rather than defining a new class that would sit 'below' MatroskaFile (because,
as you discovered, this would require a lot of code duplication), I
Hi ross,
I need to stream a mkv in a loop, i know that I need to write my own
ByteStreamFileSource subclass, problem is, its very difficult to "pass" it to
MatroskaFile without a lot of code duplication (MatroskaFileServerDemux and
MatroskaFile), is it not possible to allow some ByteStreamFileSo
