Re: [Live-devel] liveMedia and CMake

2010-06-17 Thread Michael Braitmaier
I just stumbled across this discussion and have to say that I am using CMake for over a year now with LiveMedia after assembling the necessary CMake files. It works like a charm in contrast to the previous system. This is mostly caused by the fact that I have to target both Linux and Windows env

Re: [Live-devel] liveMedia and CMake

2010-06-16 Thread Ross Finlayson
Making a visual studio project for live555 was very easy. I'll post mine to this list (or wherever appropriate) after I clean it up and make it suitable for distribution along with the standard live555 checkout. Feel free. However, we will not be distributing a "Visual Studio Project" on our w

Re: [Live-devel] liveMedia and CMake

2010-06-16 Thread Joshua Migdal
You can use makefiles just fine in windows. nmake -f . But with that said, I prefer to use Visual Studio projects instead of makefiles for my build environment. Making a visual studio project for live555 was very easy. I'll post mine to this list (or wherever appropriate) after I clean it up and m

Re: [Live-devel] liveMedia and CMake

2010-06-16 Thread Ross Finlayson
Are there any ideological objections against CMake? No. The only problem I have with using "CMake" (or something like it) is that it would impose a small burden (i.e., having to download and install a new utility) on most developers who use this software (those who develop for Unix/Posix/Lin

[Live-devel] liveMedia and CMake

2010-06-16 Thread Yuri Timenkov
Hi all, There was a mail about 4 years ago (in 2006) with patch adding support for CMake build system to liveMedia, but there was no any reaction. Are there any ideological objections against CMake? The main advantage (for me :) ) of using CMake for liveMedia is excellent windows support