Re: [Live-devel] TrackId= Vs track in a=control:

2010-01-08 Thread Ross Finlayson
BTW while digging in the specification RFC 2326 I found that section 3.4 says that the session Identifiers MUST be chosen randomly and MUST be at least eight octets long to make guessing it more difficult. Yet a fast look at the live555 library code seems to show that is doesn't choose a random se

Re: [Live-devel] TrackId= Vs track in a=control:

2010-01-07 Thread BONNEAU Guy
oun...@ns.live555.com [mailto:live-devel- >boun...@ns.live555.com] On Behalf Of Ross Finlayson >Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2010 5:36 >To: LIVE555 Streaming Media - development & use >Subject: Re: [Live-devel] TrackId= Vs track in a=control: > >>I have an RTSP client (not live555)

Re: [Live-devel] TrackId= Vs track in a=control:

2010-01-07 Thread Ross Finlayson
I have an RTSP client (not live555) that complains of the a=control:track format used by the RTSP server (live555 application) implementation of the live555 library. When I change the code of the library to use a=control:trackID= the RTSP client doesn`t complain anymore. The examples in the RTS

[Live-devel] TrackId= Vs track in a=control:

2010-01-06 Thread BONNEAU Guy
I have an RTSP client (not live555) that complains of the a=control:track format used by the RTSP server (live555 application) implementation of the live555 library. When I change the code of the library to use a=control:trackID= the RTSP client doesn`t complain anymore. The examples in the RTSP sp