Dear Ross, I solved the problem.
The behaviour happened when I set the tunneling over TCP.
When an IP camera went down, closing the streaming, I invoked the shutdown
function (as the testRTSPClient) on the delayed event. When the camera turned
on and my sw started a new RTSP connection (clien
Hi,
>From: live-devel [mailto:live-devel-boun...@ns.live555.com] On Behalf Of Ross
>>Finlayson
>>Valgrind tells me that memory leaks (or something else that lost bytes) are
>>found: >>60 bytes direct, 20.000 indirect bytes are lost in the thread,
>> in the H264BufferdPackedFactory::createNewPac
> any client for each camera runs in a separate thread
>
Note that you don't need to do this. Instead, it is possible (and, in fact,
much easier) to have multiple RTSP clients running in a single thread, using a
single event loop. Note how the "testRTSPClient" code does this.
> Valgrind tell
Dear All,
I'm using Live555 to realize a C++ RTPS client for IP cameras. I'm using most
of the testRTSPClient code.I used Poco library and Poco::Thread class too.In
other words any client for each camera runs in a separate thread that owns his
instance of Live555 objects (any thread uses an in
