Re: [Live-devel] RTP Extension Headers

2020-03-30 Thread Ross Finlayson
> On Mar 31, 2020, at 4:01 AM, Jeff Shanab wrote: > > I need to add an RTP Extension header to my on demand rtsp server and am > trying to figure out how to implement it. Right now, you can’t - because we currently don’t support them. See http://lists.live555.com/pipermail/live-devel/2019-D

[Live-devel] RTP Extension Headers

2020-03-30 Thread Jeff Shanab
In MultiFramedRTPSink we have : Boolean MultiFramedRTPSink::isTooBigForAPacket(unsigned numBytes) const { // Check whether a 'numBytes'-byte frame - together with a RTP header and // (possible) special headers - would be too big for an output packet: // (Later allow for RTP extension header!

Re: [Live-devel] RTP Extension

2008-10-30 Thread Ross Finlayson
What's wrong with putting your meta-data in another stream that is time synchronized with the H264 stream. I believe that is the intended way to do such a thing in RTP. It depends. Is the meta-data really specific to individual video frames? If so, then it's better to include it in the video

Re: [Live-devel] RTP Extension

2008-10-30 Thread Matt Schuckmann
Title: Re: [Live-devel] RTP Extension What's wrong with putting your meta-data in another stream that is time synchronized with the H264 stream. I believe that is the intended way to do such a thing in RTP. Just curious, Matt S. Yedidia Amit wrote: I mean to RTP H

Re: [Live-devel] RTP Extension

2008-10-30 Thread Ross Finlayson
I mean to RTP Header Extension. and thank you for your answer. what I am trying to do is adding meta data per frame to a H264 RFC3984 stream. another way which cross my mind is to put this meta data in NAL with unspecified NAL type (24-31). But I need it to interop with clients which dont suppor

Re: [Live-devel] RTP Extension

2008-10-30 Thread Yedidia Amit
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Finlayson Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 10:47 AM To: LIVE555 Streaming Media - development & use Subject: Re: [Live-devel] RTP Extension What is the proper way to imlement adding

Re: [Live-devel] RTP Extension

2008-10-30 Thread Ross Finlayson
What is the proper way to imlement adding RTP extension in Live555? it depends what you mean by "RTP extension". If you're referring to just implementing a new RTP payload format, then this is easy - just define and implement your own subclasses of "MultiFramedRTPSink" (for sending) and "Mult

[Live-devel] RTP Extension

2008-10-30 Thread Yedidia Amit
Hi, What is the proper way to imlement adding RTP extension in Live555? Thanks, Amit Yedidia The information in this e-mail transmission contains proprietary and business sensitive information. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail may constitute a violation of law. If you are not the in

Re: [Live-devel] RTP extension header

2008-05-21 Thread Ross Finlayson
I am wondering if there is any support in live555 to add an RTP extension header to RTP packets streamed from a server when using SimpleRTPSink? No, not really, except by rewriting some of the code. More detailed: I am using live555 to stream an MPEG2 TS file, purposely sending the RTP packet

[Live-devel] RTP extension header

2008-05-21 Thread Tonje Fredrikson
Hi, I am wondering if there is any support in live555 to add an RTP extension header to RTP packets streamed from a server when using SimpleRTPSink? More detailed: I am using live555 to stream an MPEG2 TS file, purposely sending the RTP packets out of order. I am looking for a way to (buffer and)