> Why are there casts to void* here?
Because I want the 'void*' version of "operator<<" to be used, not the 'char*'
version. I.e., I want the value to the right of "<<" to be printed as a %p,
not as a %s
Once again, not all compiler warning messages indicate bugs.
Ross Finlayson
Live Network
I got several complaints from g++ 4.6 while building.
This is the second one I'm reporting - because it looks like the casts are
not needed.
Why are there casts to void* here?
65 if (frameStart[0] != 0 || frameStart[1] != 0) {
66 envir() << "H263plusVideoRTPSink::doSpecialFrameHandli
