Re: [Live-devel] Nat and RTCP

2008-12-18 Thread Gabriele De Luca
> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:20:01 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Live-devel] Nat and RTCP > > > Thanks! > > I have another question. > If I have another application that I will open the socket audio and video, > how can I fix OnDemandServerMediaSubsession order to avoid reopening a

Re: [Live-devel] Nat and RTCP

2008-12-17 Thread Ross Finlayson
I have another question. If I have another application that I will open the socket audio and video, how can I fix OnDemandServerMediaSubsession order to avoid reopening a socket already opened (so that he can use without opening it)? There's nothing wrong with "OnDemandServerMediaSubsession",

Re: [Live-devel] Nat and RTCP

2008-12-17 Thread Gabriele De Luca
> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:14:02 -0800 > To: live-de...@ns.live555.com > From: finlay...@live555.com > Subject: Re: [Live-devel] Nat and RTCP > >>it is a blasphemy to speak of RTCP on the same port RTP to have >>fewer problems with NAT? > > Yes (it'

Re: [Live-devel] Nat and RTCP

2008-12-17 Thread Ross Finlayson
it is a blasphemy to speak of RTCP on the same port RTP to have fewer problems with NAT? Yes (it's not just 'blasphemy'; it won't work). One thing you can do, however, is use RTP/RTCP-over-TCP streaming (using the RTSP channel). That way, you need only relay one (TCP) port number - the one f

Re: [Live-devel] NAT and RTCP

2008-08-26 Thread Ross Finlayson
My hunch tells me the RTCP ports are dynamically set by the stack Yes, however, the RTP and RTCP ports start at 6970 by default (see "liveMedia/include/OnDemandServerMediaSubsession.hh"). (I chose that number because other servers - e.g., Apple's - use the same number.) RTP ports are always

[Live-devel] NAT and RTCP

2008-08-26 Thread Jerry Johns
Hey Ross, If I would like to go ahead and use a NAT with UDP streaming mode, how would I facilitate this? I have a similar behaviour where after 45 seconds, I get a liveness timeout due to the inability of RTCP packets (i.e receiver reports) to get to the streaming server from the c

Re: [Live-devel] NAT and RTCP

2008-08-20 Thread Ken Seo
Thanks Ross for your quick reply! Regards, Ken 2008/8/20 Ross Finlayson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Now the client can make an RTSP request just fine and start playing the > stream. However, the RTCP packets from the client to the server get lost and > as a result, the server stops the streaming wit

Re: [Live-devel] NAT and RTCP

2008-08-20 Thread Ross Finlayson
Now the client can make an RTSP request just fine and start playing the stream. However, the RTCP packets from the client to the server get lost and as a result, the server stops the streaming with liveness timeout after 45 seconds. I've captured RTCP packets and found out that the packet's des

[Live-devel] NAT and RTCP

2008-08-20 Thread Ken Seo
Hi, I'm just curious, if anyone addressed the case I'm having now. I have an RTSP server (Live555) running in my testing lab and recently put a router in front of it. Then I configured port-forwarding options in the router so that RTSP clients can access the RTSP server through the router's publi