HmmI have a better idea :-)
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> Embedding code on the Axis camera to call home is an excellent idea !
>
>
> Feel free to suggest this to Axis; I'd be happy to work with them to help
> make this happen.
>
>
> Ross Finlayson
> Live Networks,
> Embedding code on the Axis camera to call home is an excellent idea !
Feel free to suggest this to Axis; I'd be happy to work with them to help make
this happen.
Ross Finlayson
Live Networks, Inc.
http://www.live555.com/
___
live-devel mailing lis
Understanding the author's original intent and design philosophy is key,
especially when it comes to using their software :-)
In regards to the registering RTSP-over-HTTP back-end servers...I do not
anticipate a need for this, however, your clarification on it's
implementation within Proxy Server
>> - Proxy Server -T option does not allow for specifying a unique port per
>> stream. In NAT cases streams would have different ports. Would it be
>> possible to have this option for streams that will be using RTSP over HTTP.
>
> FYI, right now back-end RTP/RTCP-over-RTSP-over-HTTP tunneling wo
> - Proxy Server -T option does not allow for specifying a unique port per
> stream. In NAT cases streams would have different ports. Would it be possible
> to have this option for streams that will be using RTSP over HTTP.
FYI, right now back-end RTP/RTCP-over-RTSP-over-HTTP tunneling works onl
Ross,
Very nice...I look forward to seeing how this evolves.
I noticed that you implemented the ability to specify stream suffix! I will
be setting up a new test environment with the latest code base to work
through these API changes. I'll provide feedback, should I encounter
anything of interest
FYI, I have just submitted to the IETF a new Internet-Draft document that
describes our new custom "REGISTER" RTSP command (that we use in our proxy
server implementation). You can find a copy online at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-finlayson-rtsp-register-command-00
I have also rele
