Re: [Live-devel] MPEGTS FramedSource Pt2

2015-06-10 Thread Ross Finlayson
> You mentioned previously that fDurationInMicroseconds in important for the > client to request data at a correct rate. I haven't found out exactly if this > should be relative to a video frame or relative to a MPEGTS frame It should be the duration of whatever data you’re feeding to the downst

[Live-devel] MPEGTS FramedSource Pt2

2015-06-09 Thread Anthony Clark
Ross, I've been seriously poking at my (mostly) working MPEGTS FramedSource and OnDemandMediaSubsession derivatives for my MPEGTS RTSP server. I posted here (http://lists.live555.com/pipermail/live-devel/2015-June/019441.html) a few days ago from my gmail address (sorry about that). I quickly

Re: [Live-devel] MPEGTS FramedSource

2015-06-08 Thread Anthony Clark
Thanks for the quick reply! Yes, I'm still developing an RTSP server. Below is my pipeline. H264 Baseline 4.0 source (I and P frames only) -> ffmpeg (2.5) mpegts muxer -> custom FramedSource (based on DeviceSource) getting 1316 (188 * 7) byte output chunks from the mpegts muxer and writing all *c

Re: [Live-devel] MPEGTS FramedSource

2015-06-04 Thread Ross Finlayson
> I have an MPEGTS muxer (ffmpeg) that spits out 1316 (188 * 7) byte chunks of > valid data at a time. In my FramedSource subclass, I can write this to a file > via fwrite and have a perfectly playable mpegts file. I've been sending data > to `fTo` in 1316 byte chunks (as hinted in our previous

[Live-devel] MPEGTS FramedSource

2015-06-04 Thread Anthony Clark
Ross and all, I have an MPEGTS muxer (ffmpeg) that spits out 1316 (188 * 7) byte chunks of valid data at a time. In my FramedSource subclass, I can write this to a file via fwrite and have a perfectly playable mpegts file. I've been sending data to `fTo` in 1316 byte chunks (as hinted in our