Re: [Live-devel] MPEG1or2VideoReceiver+DarwinInjector

2007-11-05 Thread Ross Finlayson
>Thanks Ross that is very insightful and realized what I really wanted >to process is a Program Stream. I could use the testOnDemandRTSPServer >or testMPEG1or2AudioVideoStreamer as my simulated stream source >instead of MPEG1or2VideoStreamer. However I could not seem to find a >counterpart example

Re: [Live-devel] MPEG1or2VideoReceiver+DarwinInjector

2007-11-05 Thread Ariel Kalingking
Thanks Ross that is very insightful and realized what I really wanted to process is a Program Stream. I could use the testOnDemandRTSPServer or testMPEG1or2AudioVideoStreamer as my simulated stream source instead of MPEG1or2VideoStreamer. However I could not seem to find a counterpart example the r

Re: [Live-devel] MPEG1or2VideoReceiver+DarwinInjector

2007-11-05 Thread Ross Finlayson
>MPEG1or2VideoStreamer >--->MPEG1or2VideoReceiver|MPEG1or2AudioVideoStreamerToDarwin>DarwinServer The problem here is that "testMPEG1or2AudioVideoToDarwin" takes a MPEG *Program Stream* as input, but the data output by "testMPEG1or2VideoReceiver" is a MPEG Video *Elementary Stream". If

[Live-devel] MPEG1or2VideoReceiver+DarwinInjector

2007-11-05 Thread Ariel Kalingking
Hi Ross, In the provided MPEG1or2AudioVideoStreamerToDarwin example, is it possible to directly take an inbound stream source object instead of ByteStreamFileSource as input to MPEG1or2Demux? I am experimenting on taking the source stream in the MPEG1or2VideoReceiver and fed it to MPEG1or2Demux,