Re: [Live-devel] Hooking into LivenessCommand

2013-11-19 Thread Ross Finlayson
> Are the logs guaranteed to stay the same? Of course there's no guarantee. But that doesn't really matter, because the code will always remain Open Source. Ross Finlayson Live Networks, Inc. http://www.live555.com/ ___ live-devel mailing list live-

Re: [Live-devel] Hooking into LivenessCommand

2013-11-19 Thread Craig Matsuura
I want to integrate the capability into my app and not look at logs. My app is a proxy server that I can add and remove camera dynamically. So looking at log messages is not ideal. I did sub class the base environment and override the logging to capture to log else where besides stderr. So it co

Re: [Live-devel] Hooking into LivenessCommand

2013-11-19 Thread Ross Finlayson
On Nov 19, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Craig Matsuura wrote: > I'm looking at using the liveness to indicate to my app if the cameras > are online, I was going to sub-class ProxyRTSPClient and override > continueAfterLivenessCommand, but it is not virtual. Is there a better > way to hook the continue

[Live-devel] Hooking into LivenessCommand

2013-11-19 Thread Craig Matsuura
I'm looking at using the liveness to indicate to my app if the cameras are online, I was going to sub-class ProxyRTSPClient and override continueAfterLivenessCommand, but it is not virtual. Is there a better way to hook the continueAfterLivenessCommand, so I can determine if the connection to