Ross Finlayson wrote:
The old H.263 RTP payload format specification (RFC 2190) is now
*obsolete*, and should not be used. As noted above, use our existing
H.263+ RTP payload format (RFC 2429) implementation instead.
Yes I am aware about H263-1996 is obsolete. However I need to
integrate st
Ross Finlayson wrote:
The old H.263 RTP payload format specification (RFC 2190) is now
*obsolete*, and should not be used. As noted above, use our existing
H.263+ RTP payload format (RFC 2429) implementation instead.
Yes I am aware about H263-1996 is obsolete. However I need to integ
>I am working on setting up a streaming environment where a number of
>different RTP payload types are involved, and currently I am looking
>into reading a H263 stream (the original "H263-1996" type, not H263+).
That's fine. The newer RTP payload format can (and should) be used
to stream either
Hello all :-)
I've been on this list for some weeks now although I have not posted much.
I am working on setting up a streaming environment where a number of
different RTP payload types are involved, and currently I am looking
into reading a H263 stream (the original "H263-1996" type, not H263+
