> It doesn't seem like there's a way to dynamically resize buffers without
> losing data because in the afterGettingFunc if fNumTruncatedBytes > 0 you've
> already lost the data.
That's correct.
> So with that in mind I created a patch that I'm hoping may get incorporated
> in a future release
It doesn't seem like there's a way to dynamically resize buffers without
losing data because in the afterGettingFunc if fNumTruncatedBytes > 0
you've already lost the data. The only post I've really seen talk about
this is here:
http://lists.live555.com/pipermail/live-devel/2009-January/010083.html