Re: [Live-devel] Add a "reason for leaving" in RTCP Bye packet

2018-12-13 Thread GENESTIER Denis
Hi Ross, Many thanks for your support and your quick development!!! I will integrate your work and test it in the next few days. PS : sorry for my last erroneously “reply all” on the mailing list. Regards Denis. ___ live-devel mailing list live-devel@l

Re: [Live-devel] Add a "reason for leaving" in RTCP Bye packet

2018-12-13 Thread GENESTIER Denis
cembre 2018 06:26 À : live-devel@lists.live555.com Objet : [Live-devel] Add a "reason for leaving" in RTCP Bye packet Thanks to Denis Genestier for this suggestion. I have now installed a new version (2018.12.14) of the “LIVE555 Streaming Media” code that implements this (for both send

[Live-devel] Add a "reason for leaving" in RTCP Bye packet

2018-12-13 Thread Ross Finlayson
Thanks to Denis Genestier for this suggestion. I have now installed a new version (2018.12.14) of the “LIVE555 Streaming Media” code that implements this (for both sending and receiving RTCP “BYE” packets). There has been a change to the API. This API change is backwards compatible; however,

Re: [Live-devel] Add a "reason for leaving" in RTCP Bye packet

2018-12-10 Thread Ross Finlayson
> I think we’d have to change “setByeHandler()” to take, instead, a > “ByeHandlerFunc*” as parameter, where we define “ByeHandlerFunc” to be > something like: > typedef void ByeHandlerFunc(void* clientData, char const* byeReason = > NULL); > Note that “byeReason” is an optional parameter.

Re: [Live-devel] Add a "reason for leaving" in RTCP Bye packet

2018-12-10 Thread Ross Finlayson
> For our project we would have the requirements to make a distinction between > different use cases of RTSP server closures from the client’s side: session > shutdown for load balancing, priority management on stream access, … > For that I was thinking about using the “reason for leaving” of the

[Live-devel] Add a "reason for leaving" in RTCP Bye packet

2018-12-10 Thread GENESTIER Denis
Hi Ross, I hope everything is fine for you. For our project we would have the requirements to make a distinction between different use cases of RTSP server closures from the client's side: session shutdown for load balancing, priority management on stream access, ... For that I was thinking abou