> I got the task to add RTP to our current IPTV platform.
> The IPTV source I need to be able to play is given: RTP over TCP without RTCP
> – I know it’s rather exotic, but I can’t change this.
If this ‘IPTV source’ sends 'RTP-over-TCP without RTCP’, then the “LIVE555
Streaming Media” code shoul
Hi,
I'd be interested in this too.
I got the task to add RTP to our current IPTV platform.
The IPTV source I need to be able to play is given: RTP over TCP without RTCP -
I know it's rather exotic, but I can't change this.
I thought of trying to use some of the live555 libraries.
Franz Leu
> To me this means that there are situations where RTCP can be omitted, albeit
> this is not recommended.
Therefore I will not be adding support to the code for ‘disabling’ RTCP. Sorry.
Ross Finlayson
Live Networks, Inc.
http://www.live555.com/
___
Am 27.01.2016 um 13:20 schrieb Ross Finlayson:
we have the need to create a RTSP Session without a RTCP Instance because of a
Server that has a bug causing it not to terminate sessions after it received
an RTCP report from the client.
Sorry, but RTCP is a mandatory part of the RTP/RTCP standard
> we have the need to create a RTSP Session without a RTCP Instance because of a
> Server that has a bug causing it not to terminate sessions after it received
> an RTCP report from the client.
Sorry, but RTCP is a mandatory part of the RTP/RTCP standard. A
standards-compliant client (or server)
Hi Ross,
we have the need to create a RTSP Session without a RTCP Instance because of a
Server that has a bug causing it not to terminate sessions after it received
an RTCP report from the client.
I came up with the attached patch, which feels really ugly and I'm pretty sure
could have unexpected
