> On Mar 11, 2024, at 4:08 AM, dan_desjardins
> wrote:
>
> Sorry if this appear dumb, but why not just throw everything away until you
> receive an I-Frame.
As I noted before, the OP could program his video input source to do this -
which would give him what he wants if there is only one cl
Sorry if this appear dumb, but why not just throw everything away until you
receive an I-Frame. If your GOP is so large that you feel the need for an
out-of-sequence I-Frame than it would likely make more sense to reduce your GOP
than to create a stream that may well confuse many receivers.
--
I want something a little different. ANY client that connected began to receive
data only that included an I-frame.
That is, somewhere to write or correct the logic, with the first packet, what
if the data from the source includes an i-frame, send it, if it does not, then
skip sending and wait f
