Re: [Live-devel] Dead lock on 408 Request timeout

2020-10-05 Thread Ross Finlayson
> On Oct 5, 2020, at 10:53 PM, Eric Beuque wrote: > > Is it a bad practice to send the OPTIONS commands like i do ? No. Just the opposite, in fact. > I tried the openrtsp command, and this seems to work, but it's not sending > OPTIONS commands like me, i guess. If you add the “-K” (that’s

Re: [Live-devel] Dead lock on 408 Request timeout

2020-10-05 Thread Eric Beuque
> On Oct 4, 2020, at 8:16 PM, Alexander Tumarov > wrote: > > > > You are receiving an additional response to Describe command that was > previously received completely ( CSeq: 4). > > Your setup sent with CSeq: 5 but response came to CSeq: 4 - Handler for > this was already completed. > > Yes, th

Re: [Live-devel] Dead lock on 408 Request timeout

2020-10-05 Thread Eric Beuque
> > > Try to implement a timeout handler - I had an issue with different vendor > of cameras that were messing with sockets and it helped(although I dodn't > received 408 code but yes I was receiving unexpected responses). > I then raised the idea of setting timeout value for each command but > Ros