> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:07:45PM +0200, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> Yes, you are correct here. Fortunately, there is an easy fix (which I’ll
>> add to the code in the near future): Set “fNext” to NULL at the start of the
>> handler function (“sendNext()”). Ditto for the other places in the cod
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:07:45PM +0200, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> Yes, you are correct here. Fortunately, there is an easy fix (which I’ll add
> to the code in the near future): Set “fNext” to NULL at the start of the
> handler function (“sendNext()”). Ditto for the other places in the code
>
> I caution that
> updating the documentation is insufficient, because live555 does not
> follow this rule itself.
Yes, the “fNextTask” hack is problematic, and not just because of the example
that you noted. It’s also a problem because it makes the (in general,
unwarranted) assumption that the
