Re: [Live-devel] RTSP server behind a router

2015-09-24 Thread Ross Finlayson
From what you describe, it sounds like you’re not just behind a ‘router’, but that you’re behind a NAT box (that translates IP addresses). RTSP was never intended to work in such an environment, but the fact that you’re able to get it to work may just be luck (and something specific to your par

Re: [Live-devel] Our C++ CustomH264Sink derived classes' afterGettingFrame methods shown below are not recognizing the IFrame bytes supposed to be contained in a H264 packet generated from a file cont

2015-09-24 Thread Ross Finlayson
Does the “testRTSPClient” demo application work OK for you (with the same RTSP/RTP (I assume) source)? If so, you should start by modifying the implementation of the “DummySink” class. Note that - for H.264 video - each ‘frame’ that gets delivered from a H.264 RTSP/RTP stream (via a “H264Video

[Live-devel] RTSP server behind a router

2015-09-24 Thread Giovanni Iamonte
Hi Ross, we have an issue regarding a RTSP server behind a router. The client is able to access the streaming but it displays the first frame after more than 12 seconds from the start time, then usually playback stops after about 40 seconds. If we access the streamin

[Live-devel] Our C++ CustomH264Sink derived classes' afterGettingFrame methods shown below are not recognizing the IFrame bytes supposed to be contained in a H264 packet generated from a file containi

2015-09-24 Thread Chang, Frank
Good morning. Our C++ CustomH264Sink derived classes' afterGettingFrame methods shown below are not recognizing the IFrame bytes supposed to be contained in a H264 packet generated from a file containing 5 minutes of Live555 H264 video data. Please tell me what we are doing incorrectly or for

Re: [Live-devel] RTSPClient bug?

2015-09-24 Thread ChaseopIm
Thank you for your comments. ChaSeop Im ___ live-devel mailing list live-devel@lists.live555.com http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/live-devel

Re: [Live-devel] RTSPClient bug?

2015-09-24 Thread Ross Finlayson
Yes, I think you’ve found a bug in the code. Note, however, that you seem to be using an old version of the code, because: > In this case, foundRequest can’t access because it is deleted. But, > handleRequestBytes accesses foundRequest on 1835 line. It occurs crash. In the current version of th

[Live-devel] RTSPClient bug?

2015-09-24 Thread ChaseopIm
HI. I think that RTSPClient is occurred crash in handleRequestBytes. handleRequestBytes could called resendCommand when received 401 response code. resendCommand call sendRequest and sendRequest checks openConnection. When openConnection returned -1, sendRequest delete request(this is foundR