On Mar 11, 2013, at 12:01 PM, Chris Van Brederode
wrote:
> We're in somewhat of a time crunch here
Do "we" not have our own domain name? :-)
Ross Finlayson
Live Networks, Inc.
http://www.live555.com/
___
live-devel mailing list
live-devel@lists.live
Thanks for the reply
I went ahead and re-implemented MPEG4VideoFileServerMediaSubsession (as
MPEG4VideoFileServerMediaSubsession2) using a preferredFrameSize of 200. I
did this before you responded, and it turned out it works relatively well.
VLC still has some hiccoughs here and there with the
The namespace would allow us to get away from the define which is a text
substitution and is what causes the clash.
However. What about something like
#if Defined(USE_LIVE555_NAMESPACES)
# define OPENLIVENS namespace {
# define CLOSELIVENS } // close namespace LIVE555
# define LIVENS LIVE555
Hi Chris,
have you ever seen C++ compiler for embedded systems? They are far away
from full c++ 2003 compliance (mostly as not so many C++ features are
used in embedded development - RTTI, exceptions, namespaces, templates -
just a few samples).
Nikolai
From:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Nikolai Vorontsov <
nikolai.voront...@quadrox.be> wrote:
<--snip-->
**
> Also, if some of supported compilers doesn't use namespaces (well, may be
> some embedded one) - then you might need to use conditional compilation as
> you did over 9000 times before ;-)
>
> may be the easiest solution for such issue is to wrap all Live555
> functionality in a namespace? And place "using namespace Live555;" somewhere
> in it's header.
Yes, that's certainly a possibility for the future. To date, however, I've
avoided using C++ namespaces, because I don't want to
Hi Ross & Jeff,
first of all in Boost 1.49 I didn't find a Boolean class. May be it's in
a newer version defined.
Second, Ross - the issue here is that someone might need to have to
include both Live555 and other library (boost or libvc) headers to his
_single_ source file. If other library de
Hi Ross,
may be the easiest solution for such issue is to wrap all Live555
functionality in a namespace? And place "using namespace Live555;"
somewhere in it's header.
Then people that uses boost (or any other library that clashes with your
lib by internal names/types) should not have a problem.
> I am updating live555 from 2012.2.29 to 2013.03.07 and found a change in
> Boolean.hh that breaks my build. From reading the changelog, I think this is
> recent.
>
> The line
> “ #define Boolean bool “
No, it's *not* recent; it's almost 9 months old! From the changelog:
2012.06.12:
- U
I am updating live555 from 2012.2.29 to 2013.03.07 and found a change in
Boolean.hh that breaks my build. From reading the changelog, I think this is
recent.
The line
" #define Boolean bool "
Overwrites a class name in boost (move.cpp) where there is a class with the
name Boolean
In th
10 matches
Mail list logo
