Re: [Live-devel] negative presentation time in "afterGettingFrame" sink callback

2013-01-15 Thread Ross Finlayson
> I downloaded your latest and ran it. The output is below. > I don’t see much difference between the versions and I couldn’t pin point > your change diffing the sources. > > Am I missing something? Yes, you didn't upgrade your client application. It's still running version 2012.11.16 of our

Re: [Live-devel] RTP header extension

2013-01-15 Thread Ross Finlayson
> Do you plan to include a callback to give the opportunity to manage the RTP > header without rewriting MultiFramedRTPSource ? Yes, at some point... Ross Finlayson Live Networks, Inc. http://www.live555.com/ ___ live-devel mailing list live-devel@lis

Re: [Live-devel] negative presentation time in "afterGettingFrame" sink callback

2013-01-15 Thread Ross Finlayson
> Received a complete PLAY response: > RTSP/1.0 200 OK > CSeq: 6 > Session: 872219556 > Range: npt=now- > RTP-Info: > url=rtsp://10.0.70.22:554/video1+audio1/trackID=0;seq=35711,url=rtsp://10.0.70.22:554/video1+audio1/trackID=1;seq=62268,url=rtsp://10.0.70.22:554/video1+audio1/events;seq=4796 FYI

[Live-devel] RTP header extension

2013-01-15 Thread PROMONET Michel
Hi Ross, Looking in the mailing list I found the subject was discuss in http://lists.live555.com/pipermail/live-devel/2009-April/010424.html It seems that actual code just drop RTP header extension, isn't it ? Do you plan to include a callback to give the opportunity to manage th