I have a similar situation, although the original program had only a sink that
wrote MJPEG to disk.
I now have a sink that allows subscribers. The sink in my case calls add
datablock with a boost::shared pointer to the frame (after my filter) on all
subscribers.
Each subscriber has a ring buffe
1. Would having a fully implemented Tee-sink / Frame Duplicator class
offer significant advantages over ad-hoc methods of replicating a stream
(eg. inside filters)?
It depends on what you want to do with each 'replica'. If you just need
two 'replicas' - one going to a LIVE555 "MediaSink"
> 1. Would having a fully implemented Tee-sink / Frame Duplicator class
> offer significant advantages over ad-hoc methods of replicating a stream (eg.
> inside filters)?
It depends on what you want to do with each 'replica'. If you just need two
'replicas' - one going to a LIVE555 "Medi
Consulting
http://www.tmvoip.com/
phone: +21321656139
Mobile: +213660347746
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6652 (2022) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
_
Hi all,
Like many others, I am interested in connecting a single source to multiple
sinks in order to write the stream to disk in a playable format (AVI in my
case) and also display it. I have reviewed various posts on the topic:
http://lists.live555.com/pipermail/live-devel/2006-July/004648
