Re: [Live-devel] Frame -- as used in the live555 code, is this a 'video' frame?

2011-08-11 Thread Ross Finlayson
The IETF has defined new payload formats (and encoding) for doing FEC on RTP streams. However, we don't yet implement any of them (although we might in the future). But implementing these requires a lot more work than just slapping some FEC encoding and decoding code onto the existing code. S

Re: [Live-devel] Sending periodic metadata XML fragments-- should I use SimpleRTPSource or modify MediaSession?

2011-08-11 Thread Ross Finlayson
On Aug 11, 2011, at 8:08 AM, Dave McMordie wrote: > Great library-- it was a pleasure to integrate! We are transmitting a > sequence of uncorrelated image frames using a subclass of JPEGVideoSource. > > We would also like to transmit a stream of XML fragments (one-to-one with the > video frame

[Live-devel] Frame -- as used in the live555 code, is this a 'video' frame?

2011-08-11 Thread John Clark
I am developing a package to use FEC code on video streams. Previously I was just applying the FEC code to any packet that was coming from a camera. However, in looking at the live555 code, it seems that, for example, an RTP stream is received then video data extracted in terms of 'frames', It in

[Live-devel] Sending periodic metadata XML fragments-- should I use SimpleRTPSource or modify MediaSession?

2011-08-11 Thread Dave McMordie
Hi Ross / Live Developers, Great library-- it was a pleasure to integrate! We are transmitting a sequence of uncorrelated image frames using a subclass of JPEGVideoSource. We would also like to transmit a stream of XML fragments (one-to-one with the video frames) which contain information abou