Re: [Live-devel] Adding support for DV video

2009-04-26 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 15:50 -0700, Ross Finlayson wrote: [...] > >In fact I use a whole DV frame (12-576000 bytes), which will then be > >split across a large number of packets. I take it this is not the > >correct way to use frames in liveMedia? > > No, actually that is correct. Those are v

Re: [Live-devel] Adding support for DV video

2009-04-26 Thread Ross Finlayson
In fact I use a whole DV frame (12-576000 bytes), which will then be split across a large number of packets. I take it this is not the correct way to use frames in liveMedia? No, actually that is correct. Those are very large frame sizes, though - yow! I am currently using the kluge of

Re: [Live-devel] Adding support for DV video

2009-04-26 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 22:21 -0700, Ross Finlayson wrote: [...] > >According to the RFC, each packet must contain a whole number of DV > >blocks (i.e. the RTP payload size must be a multiple of 80) but it > >doesn't appear to be possible to control fragment sizes in this way in > >liveMedia. > > In

[Live-devel] retreiving an MPEG2-TS without rtsp

2009-04-26 Thread tadmorm1
Hi, although I am using unicast, I made the proper changes to the receiver file as instructed in the comments. I made a "cout << ..." statement in the "gropsoclHelper" class and it is clear that the data is received in the buffer, every time I stream from VLC the port reads 1316 bytes each tim