Had it better that the first SR package is sent following
the first RTP package?
You mean "packet", not "package".
If so, the Client may know the relationship of server NTP time
and server RTP timestamp as quickly as possible
Actually, it would be even better if the first RTCP
HI,Guys
Had it better that the first SR package is sent following the first
RTP package?
If so, the Client may know the relationship of server NTP time and
server RTP timestamp as quickly as possible
How do you think?
Aiden
___
single-thread ,that is the reason! Thank you very much.
2008/10/20 Ross Finlayson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> In Live555, I find that:
>> Create a socket, and then set it nonblock.
>> I cannot understand, why choosing the nonblock?
>
> Because applications that use the "LIVE555 Streaming M
In Live555, I find that:
Create a socket, and then set it nonblock.
I cannot understand, why choosing the nonblock?
Because applications that use the "LIVE555 Streaming Media" code run
as a single-threaded event loop, we usually can't block on I/O
to/from a socket.
Ross Fi
hi, everyone:
In Live555, I find that:
Create a socket, and then set it nonblock.
I cannot understand, why choosing the nonblock?
zhenfeng ren
___
live-devel mailing list
live-devel@lists.live555.com
http://lists.live555.com/mailman/listinfo/liv
